MDA registration requires administrative documents (establishment licence, AR declaration, GMDN code), a completed CSDT, ERSP checklist, risk management file, clinical evidence, labelling and IFU, and ISO 13485 certification. Requirements scale by class — Class A submits directly to MDA; Class B, C, and D require a full CSDT and CAB conformity assessment first.
Incomplete documentation is the most common reason MDA submissions are delayed or returned. Not because manufacturers are careless — but because knowing that a CSDT is required is very different from knowing exactly what every section must contain, which annexes apply to your device class, and what the MDA considers a compliant cross-reference.
This guide gives you the full, class-by-class document checklist — built directly from MDA guidance documents MDA/GD/0008 and MDA/GD/0070 (Second Edition, October 2025) — so you know exactly what to prepare before a single document is drafted. For a full walkthrough of the end-to-end process, see our guide on how to register a medical device in Malaysia.
Key Takeaways
- All device classes require administrative documents — establishment licence, AR declaration, GMDN code, and MeDC@St application form.
- Class A devices submit directly to MDA with lighter documentation — no CAB required for standard devices, with exceptions for sterile and measuring subtypes.
- Class B, C, and D require a full CSDT and conformity assessment by a registered CAB before MDA submission.
- Every CSDT section must be addressed — if a section does not apply, a documented justification for non-applicability is required.
- All certificates and reports must be signed, dated, and within their validity period at time of submission.
- Devices already approved by FDA, EU CE, HSA, TGA, or Health Canada may qualify for the expedited Verification Route.
- Incorrect or missing documentation is closely related to common classification mistakes — getting both right from the start protects your timeline.
Confirm These Two Things First
Before assembling any documents, you need to confirm your device classification and your regulatory pathway. These two decisions determine your exact document set.
For devices without prior approval from a recognised authority. Requires full CSDT and CAB assessment for Class B, C, and D devices before MDA submission.
For devices already approved by US FDA, EU CE, Singapore HSA, TGA Australia, or Health Canada. The CAB relies on prior approval — significantly faster. Same core documents are still required. See how Malaysia compares to other ASEAN markets for context.
Foreign manufacturers must appoint a Local Authorised Representative (LAR) before any submission can be made. The LAR holds the MeDC@St account and submits all documents on your behalf.
Class ADocuments Required for Class A Registration
Class A devices follow a simplified pathway — submissions go directly to the MDA via MeDC@St with no CAB conformity assessment required for standard devices. This is governed by the Medical Device Act 2012 (Act 737). Class A sterile and measuring devices have additional validation requirements beyond the standard list below.
| Administrative documents | ||
| MeDC@St application form | Completed via the MDA online portal | Required |
| Establishment licence | LAR, importer, or manufacturer licence issued by MDA | Required |
| AR Declaration | Annex B format per MDA/GD/0041 | Required |
| GMDN code | Global Medical Device Nomenclature code for the device | Required |
| GDPMD certificate | Good Distribution Practice for Medical Devices certificate | Required |
| Product list | All models, configurations, and variants to be registered | Required |
| Technical documents | ||
| Device description and intended use | Clear statement of medical purpose, indications, and patient population | Required |
| ERSP checklist | Essential Requirements for Safety and Performance, per MDA template | Required |
| Declaration of Conformity | MDA format per Appendix 1A, Medical Device Regulations 2012 | Required |
| Labelling and IFU | All labels, packaging text, and Instructions for Use | Required |
| Additional (device subtype dependent) | ||
| Sterilisation validation | Required for Class A sterile devices only | If sterile |
| Metrological confirmation records | Required for Class A measuring devices only | If measuring |
Documents Required for Class B Registration
Class B devices require a full CSDT and must undergo conformity assessment by a registered CAB before the MDA submission. The CAB issues a certificate and assessment report upon successful review — both must be included in your MDA submission package. Unsure which class your device falls into? Read our complete classification guide.
| Administrative documents | ||
| All Class A administrative documents | MeDC@St form, establishment licence, AR declaration, GMDN, GDPMD, product list | Required |
| CAB certificate | Issued by a registered Conformity Assessment Body after successful review | Required |
| CAB assessment report | Full assessment report from the CAB, signed and dated | Required |
| CSDT core sections (MDA/GD/0008) | ||
| Executive summary | Device synopsis, commercial history, summary of CSDT contents | Required |
| Device description and intended use | Intended use, indications, contraindications, principle of operation | Required |
| ERSP checklist with cross-references | Every applicable EP addressed with method and controlled document reference | Required |
| Design verification and validation summary | Summary of testing confirming device meets specifications | Required |
| Risk management report | ISO 14971 risk management file | Required |
| Clinical evaluation report | Summary of clinical evidence demonstrating safety and performance | Required |
| ISO 13485 certificate | Valid QMS certification from the manufacturer | Required |
| Labelling and IFU | Must be consistent with CSDT, intended use, and clinical evaluation | Required |
| Post-market surveillance plan | PMS strategy for monitoring device performance after approval | Required |
| Declaration of Conformity | MDA format, Appendix 1A | Required |
| HS Code | Harmonized System Code for customs classification | Required |
| Supporting documents | ||
| Reference agency approvals | CE, FDA, TGA, HSA, or Health Canada certificates and approval letters | If available |
| Commercial marketing history | List of countries where device is marketed and dates of market entry | If applicable |
Additional Documents Required for Class C
Class C submissions include everything in the Class B list. The following documents are additional requirements at this level, reflecting the higher risk profile and more demanding CAB assessment.
| Full clinical evaluation report | Comprehensive data, not a summary — systematic literature review or clinical investigation data | Required |
| Post-market clinical follow-up plan | Ongoing clinical monitoring strategy beyond the standard PMS plan | Required |
| Biocompatibility assessment | ISO 10993 series — required for all devices with patient contact | Required |
| Sterilisation validation | For devices supplied sterile | If sterile |
| Software lifecycle documentation | IEC 62304 — for devices containing embedded or companion software | If software |
| EMC test reports | IEC 61000 series — for active devices | If active |
| Electrical safety test reports | IEC 60601 series — for electrically powered devices | If powered |
| Long-term implant safety data | Chronic biocompatibility and fatigue data for implantable components | If implantable |
Additional Documents Required for Class D
Class D devices carry the highest risk and require the most stringent documentation. These submissions build on the full Class C list with the following additional requirements.
| Full clinical investigation data | Or a comprehensive systematic literature review with extended long-term follow-up data — a summary is not sufficient at this level | Required |
| Detailed PMS system documentation | Full post-market surveillance system — not just a plan, but evidence of the entire monitoring infrastructure | Required |
| Comprehensive risk-benefit analysis | Full ISO 14971 risk management file with an explicit, documented benefit-risk determination | Required |
| Vigilance and incident reporting procedures | Documented processes for reporting adverse events to the MDA post-approval | Required |
| Additional manufacturing QA documentation | Extended QMS evidence appropriate for life-sustaining or life-supporting device types | Required |
What Each CSDT Section Must Cover
The CSDT is governed by MDA/GD/0008. Every section must be addressed. If a section does not apply to your device, a documented justification of non-applicability is required — blank entries are not accepted by the CAB or MDA. For IVD devices, additional evidence requirements apply — see our IVD classification guide.
Device synopsis, novel features, commercial marketing history, and a summary of CSDT contents. Must be consistent with all other sections throughout the dossier.
Each applicable Essential Principle addressed with the method used to demonstrate conformity and a cross-reference to the supporting controlled document. Non-applicable principles require written rationale.
Full description including components, operating principle, indications, contraindications, intended patient population, and intended user. This section drives classification — it must be precise.
Summary of all testing and validation confirming the device meets its specifications. Full test reports must be available for CAB review on request.
Clinical evaluation report or performance data. Depth scales with class — summary for Class B, full report for Class C, complete clinical investigation data for Class D.
All labels, packaging, and Instructions for Use. Must be consistent with the intended use statement, CSDT, and clinical evaluation. IFU must cover safe use procedures, frequency, duration, and preparation steps.
ISO 14971 risk management report covering hazard identification, risk estimation, risk evaluation, and risk control measures. A full risk-benefit analysis is required for Class D devices.
Manufacturing process description, site details, QMS certification (ISO 13485), and authorised signatory details. All certificates must be valid and within their stated validity period.
Six Submission Mistakes That Delay Approval
These documentation pitfalls are closely linked to the broader classification mistakes that delay MDA submissions. Fixing both before submission is the most effective way to protect your timeline.
The intended use in the CSDT, labelling, IFU, clinical evaluation, and MeDC@St application must be identical. Any inconsistency triggers an MDA query and pauses the review clock.
ISO 13485, CAB assessment certificates, and reference agency approvals must all be valid at the submission date. Check validity before submitting — not at the point you originally obtained them.
Every controlled document referenced in the EPSP checklist must be submitted in full with clear cross-references. Missing or broken links are the most common cause of CAB queries.
Each applicable essential requirement must be addressed with the specific method used to demonstrate conformity. Generic responses and blank entries are not accepted by the CAB or MDA.
If a CSDT section does not apply to your device, a documented written rationale must be provided. Leaving sections blank without explanation will result in a request for clarification.
All certificates and reports must carry the signature and date of the person issuing them. Unsigned documents are invalid and will be rejected at the first review stage.
Documentation Support from TT Medical
Preparing a complete and compliant MDA submission requires both regulatory knowledge and careful attention to detail. TT Medical supports manufacturers at every stage of documentation preparation — from confirming classification and drafting the intended use statement, to reviewing the full CSDT before it goes to the CAB. Learn more about our experience or explore our full range of services.
Final Thoughts
A complete and well-prepared documentation package is the single most reliable way to avoid delays during MDA review. The MDA does not approve devices — it approves submissions. If the submission is incomplete, inconsistent, or incorrectly structured, the timeline resets regardless of how good the device actually is.
Use this checklist as your starting point. Have your documentation reviewed by an experienced regulatory consultant before it goes to the CAB. And if you're unsure which documents apply to your specific device class, speak to our consultancy team before you begin.
FAQ